<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for That Shakespeherian Rag</title>
	<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kelln Goes All Cory Doctorow by Oliver Pocknell</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-436</link>
		<author>Oliver Pocknell</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-436</guid>
					<description>The facebook group certainly worked for me. I never joined the group (it currently has 160 members) but, since he left it open, I read several of the extracts. He writes in a genre that I generally don't enjoy, but it was enough of a sample for me to pick up some of his work as a gift for my sister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The facebook group certainly worked for me. I never joined the group (it currently has 160 members) but, since he left it open, I read several of the extracts. He writes in a genre that I generally don&#8217;t enjoy, but it was enough of a sample for me to pick up some of his work as a gift for my sister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Job of Dispensing Praise by Corey Redekop</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/12/the-job-of-dispensing-praise/#comment-435</link>
		<author>Corey Redekop</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/12/the-job-of-dispensing-praise/#comment-435</guid>
					<description>But...but I LOVE praise!  Don't cut me off, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;but I LOVE praise!  Don&#8217;t cut me off, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kelln Goes All Cory Doctorow by Zachariah Wells</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-433</link>
		<author>Zachariah Wells</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-433</guid>
					<description>No criticism of yrself intended; I'm just wondering about fictional evocations of controversy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No criticism of yrself intended; I&#8217;m just wondering about fictional evocations of controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kelln Goes All Cory Doctorow by Steven W. Beattie</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-432</link>
		<author>Steven W. Beattie</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-432</guid>
					<description>I don't writes 'em, man, I just quotes 'em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t writes &#8216;em, man, I just quotes &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kelln Goes All Cory Doctorow by Zachariah Wells</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-431</link>
		<author>Zachariah Wells</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/08/kelln-goes-all-cory-doctorow/#comment-431</guid>
					<description>Um, shouldn't that be PROvoke?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, shouldn&#8217;t that be PROvoke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TSR Author Interview &#8212; Stephen Henighan by Steven W. Beattie</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-428</link>
		<author>Steven W. Beattie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 03:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-428</guid>
					<description>Now, boys, am I going to have to come over there and separate you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, boys, am I going to have to come over there and separate you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TSR Author Interview &#8212; Stephen Henighan by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-427</link>
		<author>Nathan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-427</guid>
					<description>Ponce? &lt;i&gt;Moi&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponce? <i>Moi</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Bit of the Old Ultraviolence by Jess</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/06/a-bit-of-the-old-ultraviolence/#comment-425</link>
		<author>Jess</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/05/06/a-bit-of-the-old-ultraviolence/#comment-425</guid>
					<description>This is another passage by Nietzsche that appeals to me. I read it as another argument in favour of the cathartic role of cartoon violence as it appeals to our base desires which are suppressed to allow us to properly function within society. 

--

From Nietzsche's &lt;a href="http://www.authorama.com/beyond-good-and-evil-1.html" title="Beyond Good And Evil" rel="nofollow"&gt;Beyond Good And Evil&lt;/a&gt;

259. To refrain mutually from injury, from violence, from exploitation, and put one’s will on a par with that of others: this may result in a certain rough sense in good conduct among individuals when the necessary conditions are given (namely, the actual similarity of the individuals in amount of force and degree of worth, and their co-relation within one organization). As soon, however, as one wished to take this principle more generally, and if possible even as the FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF SOCIETY, it would immediately disclose what it really is—namely, a Will to the DENIAL of life, a principle of dissolution and decay. Here one must think profoundly to the very basis and resist all sentimental weakness: life itself is ESSENTIALLY appropriation, injury, conquest of the strange and weak, suppression, severity, obtrusion of peculiar forms, incorporation, and at the least, putting it mildest, exploitation;—but why should one for ever use precisely these words on which for ages a disparaging purpose has been stamped? Even the organization within which, as was previously supposed, the individuals treat each other as equal—it takes place in every healthy aristocracy—must itself, if it be a living and not a dying organization, do all that towards other bodies, which the individuals within it refrain from doing to each other it will have to be the incarnated Will to Power, it will endeavour to grow, to gain ground, attract to itself and acquire ascendancy— not owing to any morality or immorality, but because it LIVES, and because life IS precisely Will to Power. On no point, however, is the ordinary consciousness of Europeans more unwilling to be corrected than on this matter, people now rave everywhere, even under the guise of science, about coming conditions of society in which “the exploiting character” is to be absent—that sounds to my ears as if they promised to invent a mode of life which should refrain from all organic functions. "Exploitation” does not belong to a depraved, or imperfect and primitive society it belongs to the nature of the living being as a primary organic function, it is a consequence of the intrinsic Will to Power, which is precisely the Will to Life—Granting that as a theory this is a novelty—as a reality it is the FUNDAMENTAL FACT of all history let us be so far honest towards ourselves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another passage by Nietzsche that appeals to me. I read it as another argument in favour of the cathartic role of cartoon violence as it appeals to our base desires which are suppressed to allow us to properly function within society. </p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>From Nietzsche&#8217;s <a href="http://www.authorama.com/beyond-good-and-evil-1.html" title="Beyond Good And Evil" rel="nofollow">Beyond Good And Evil</a></p>
<p>259. To refrain mutually from injury, from violence, from exploitation, and put one’s will on a par with that of others: this may result in a certain rough sense in good conduct among individuals when the necessary conditions are given (namely, the actual similarity of the individuals in amount of force and degree of worth, and their co-relation within one organization). As soon, however, as one wished to take this principle more generally, and if possible even as the FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF SOCIETY, it would immediately disclose what it really is—namely, a Will to the DENIAL of life, a principle of dissolution and decay. Here one must think profoundly to the very basis and resist all sentimental weakness: life itself is ESSENTIALLY appropriation, injury, conquest of the strange and weak, suppression, severity, obtrusion of peculiar forms, incorporation, and at the least, putting it mildest, exploitation;—but why should one for ever use precisely these words on which for ages a disparaging purpose has been stamped? Even the organization within which, as was previously supposed, the individuals treat each other as equal—it takes place in every healthy aristocracy—must itself, if it be a living and not a dying organization, do all that towards other bodies, which the individuals within it refrain from doing to each other it will have to be the incarnated Will to Power, it will endeavour to grow, to gain ground, attract to itself and acquire ascendancy— not owing to any morality or immorality, but because it LIVES, and because life IS precisely Will to Power. On no point, however, is the ordinary consciousness of Europeans more unwilling to be corrected than on this matter, people now rave everywhere, even under the guise of science, about coming conditions of society in which “the exploiting character” is to be absent—that sounds to my ears as if they promised to invent a mode of life which should refrain from all organic functions. &#8220;Exploitation” does not belong to a depraved, or imperfect and primitive society it belongs to the nature of the living being as a primary organic function, it is a consequence of the intrinsic Will to Power, which is precisely the Will to Life—Granting that as a theory this is a novelty—as a reality it is the FUNDAMENTAL FACT of all history let us be so far honest towards ourselves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TSR Author Interview &#8212; Stephen Henighan by Zachariah Wells</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-423</link>
		<author>Zachariah Wells</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-423</guid>
					<description>Hey, at least I don't have a PhD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, at least I don&#8217;t have a PhD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TSR Author Interview &#8212; Stephen Henighan by Alex</title>
		<link>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-422</link>
		<author>Alex</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevenwbeattie.com/2008/04/28/tsr-author-interview-stephen-henighan/#comment-422</guid>
					<description>Ha! I always suspected you two were a pair of Perrier-drinking ponces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I always suspected you two were a pair of Perrier-drinking ponces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
